play icon for videos
Use case

Logic Model: Transforming Program Theory into Continuous, Evidence-Driven Learning

Build and deliver a rigorous logic model in weeks, not years. Learn step-by-step how to define inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes—and how Sopact Sense automates data alignment for real-time evaluation and continuous learning.

Logic models become static, un-used planning documents.

80% of time wasted on cleaning data
Up to 80 % of time wasted cleaning data.

Data teams spend the bulk of their day fixing silos, typos, and duplicates instead of generating insights.

Data teams spend the bulk of their day fixing silos, typos, and duplicates instead of generating insights.

Disjointed Data Collection Process
Disjointed data collection prevents logic model coherence

Hard to coordinate design, data entry, and stakeholder input across departments, leading to inefficiencies and silos.

Hard to coordinate inputs, activities and stakeholder input across departments, causing inefficiencies and broken data flows.nsights and slowing decision-making.

Lost in Translation
Qualitative feedback remains unused and unanalyzed at scale.

Open-ended feedback, documents, images, and video sit unused—impossible to analyze at scale.

Open-ended feedback, documents, images and video sit unused—impossible to analyze within static logic model frameworks.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Logic Model: Turning Feedback Into Measurable Change

A logic model (sometimes called a Logical Framework) is your program’s roadmap from inputs and activities to outputs, outcomes and impact. But in many organizations it sits once a year—on a wall or in a PDF—unused and outdated.

In this guide you’ll learn how to build a living logic model that evolves with your program and turns evidence into action. You will:

  1. Define clear inputs, activities, outputs and outcomes that link directly to your mission.
  2. Set up data systems that capture evidence at every stage—so you’re not just tracking activities but proving change.
  3. Automate data flows so your logic model remains coherent across time, cohorts and interventions.
  4. Integrate qualitative feedback and narratives to ensure your model reflects stakeholder experience, not just numbers.
  5. Transform your logic model from a compliance deliverable into a tool for continuous learning, adaptation and growth.

By the end, you’ll be ready to move from static diagrams to dynamic learning systems—where every piece of data strengthens your understanding of how change happens.

A logic model is more than a diagram — it’s the missing link between what organizations do and the real-world outcomes they create. Whether you’re building jobs, improving health access, or running an accelerator, a logic model helps you prove that your work doesn’t just produce numbers — it improves lives.

In the opening of Logic Model Excellence: Practical Applications from Industry Experts, Sachi, one of Sopact’s long-time collaborators, says:

“It is not enough for us to just count the number of jobs that we have created. We really want to figure out — are these jobs improving lives? Because at the end of the day, that’s why we exist.”

That sentence captures the heart of a logic model — moving from activity to meaning, from output to outcome.

If you’ve ever struggled to explain how your programs create lasting change, this short video will resonate deeply. It walks through how organizations can break down their mission, step by step, into measurable, cause-and-effect pathways — and why focusing on outcomes (not just outputs) is what separates compliance from genuine impact.

This video sets the tone for the rest of this article — practical, honest, and deeply rooted in the realities of mission-driven work. You’ll see how organizations like Upaya Social Ventures use logic models to connect every step of their process — from funding and activities to outcomes and lasting impact — and how Sopact turns those insights into real-time data systems for continuous learning.

A logic model framework, when designed well, doesn’t just help you plan — it helps you think. It forces you to define what success actually means, how it’s achieved, and what evidence will prove it.

Why Logic Models Still Matter

Every organization wants to show impact — but most still struggle to explain how it actually happens. Between big mission statements and raw data sits a critical gap: understanding the cause-and-effect logic behind your work. That’s exactly what a logic model solves.

A logic model provides structure to complexity. It breaks down a mission into a clear sequence of inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impact — showing how one leads to another. Instead of simply stating what you hope to achieve, it makes your reasoning visible, testable, and measurable.

For many mission-driven teams, the logic model is the first time everything finally connects. It’s where strategic intent, program design, and data collection align in one continuous chain of accountability.

But Sopact sees the logic model framework differently from traditional evaluation approaches. For us, it isn’t a static document made for funders — it’s a living map of learning.

Traditional models often end up as PDFs that no one revisits after a grant cycle. Sopact’s view is that a logic model should evolve with evidence. Each new data point — from surveys, interviews, or program outcomes — should strengthen or refine your model’s assumptions.

With clean, AI-ready data, this structure becomes dynamic. You can track outcomes in real time, visualize shifts in stakeholder behavior, and adjust strategy before opportunities are lost.

In that sense, the modern logic model is not just about proving impact; it’s about improving impact continuously. It bridges the gap between theory and action, between data and decision.

As Sachi said in the video,

“Too many people stop at outputs. But if we simply measure outcomes — even without perfect research — we gain powerful insights that help us improve our model.”

That’s the lesson every organization can apply. The logic model is not about perfection; it’s about learning faster, staying honest, and connecting everyday actions to the outcomes that truly matter.

Core Components of a Logic Model

Every strong logic model is built around five connected parts: inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impact.

  1. 1 Inputs — Defining What You Invest
    Inputs are the people, resources, expertise, and partnerships that make your mission possible—and your theory of intent. Before any data is collected, clarify the problem you’re solving and the assumptions guiding your model. These become the first datapoints in your evidence system.
    Example: An accelerator’s inputs include financial capital, mentorship, and market access—with a strategic intent to “create dignified, long-term employment.” That intent organizes all later metrics.
    Note: In Sopact, inputs form the first column of your evidence system and anchor later indicators.
  2. 2 Activities — What You Do to Drive Change
    Activities are the tangible actions you take—workshops, trainings, investments, campaigns, outreach. Design each activity to generate structured, clean-at-source feedback (e.g., satisfaction, engagement, attendance, short narratives) so analysis later is learning, not cleanup.
    Design tip: Add brief activity forms or pulses in Sopact Sense; responses link to participant IDs automatically.
  3. 3 Outputs — What You Can Immediately Measure
    Outputs are direct, countable results within your control. They confirm reach and consistency—but they’re not outcomes. They form the operational bridge between effort and effect.
    Examples:
    Participants trained
    Enterprises accelerated
    Health consultations delivered
    In Sopact Sense, output data flows directly from forms and links back to each participant identity.
  4. 4 Outcomes — The Changes You Influence
    Outcomes capture changes in skills, behavior, confidence, or conditions that follow your outputs—the “so what.” Measure directional change with both quantitative metrics and qualitative narratives for early insight into performance.
    Examples:
    Job placement within six months
    Enterprise revenue growth and follow-on investment
    Improved food security or education access
  5. 5 Impact — The Long-Term Difference You Aim to Prove
    Impact reflects systemic change (e.g., reduced poverty, improved health, restored ecosystems). While RCTs can prove causality, Sopact’s pragmatic view is that consistent outcome tracking and adaptation over time build credible impact evidence.
    Promise of the model: Not perfection or compliance—continuous evolution toward higher-impact decisions.

How to Develop a Logic Model Step-by-Step

Make the invisible visible—move from effort to evidence, mission to measurable change.

  1. 1 Clarify the Mission and Context
    Start with why you exist. Define the problem and systemic barriers. Align data strategy with purpose so every metric maps back to your mission.
    Example mission: Create dignified, long-term jobs for underserved communities by supporting social enterprises that hire locally.
  2. 2 Identify Core Inputs
    List funding, people, infrastructure, partnerships, knowledge—plus strategic advantages like community networks or policy influence. In Sopact, inputs seed financial and operational metrics (e.g., investment size, staff hours).
  3. 3 Define Key Activities
    Translate mission into repeatable interventions—training, acceleration, outreach, research, events. Add simple, in-flow data capture at each activity so evidence begins where action happens.
  4. 4 Describe Outputs Clearly
    Outputs are immediate, countable, controllable. Use the pattern Activity → Direct Result to ensure clarity and comparability.
    Workforce example:
    Conduct job-readiness workshops → 300 youth trained
    Host employer networking events → 40 partnerships established
  5. 5 Map Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes
    Specify changes in knowledge, behavior, or conditions if activities succeed. Use mixed methods to connect what happened to why it mattered.
    Examples:
    Increased digital confidence (quant + qual)
    70% participants employed within 6 months
    ≥4 prenatal sessions attended; higher satisfaction with tele-consults
  6. 6 Define and Track Long-Term Impact
    Articulate how outcomes contribute to lasting change (income mobility, maternal health, ecosystem restoration). Treat impact as a learning continuum by connecting outcome data across time and programs.
  7. 7 Establish Metrics and Feedback Loops
    Define indicators, qualitative feedback, and cadence (pre/mid/post). Sopact Sense automates the loop—linking surveys, transcripts, and reports to each logic-model component for live dashboards.
    Practical formula: If we invest [inputs] and implement [activities], we will produce [outputs] that lead to [outcomes] and contribute to [long-term impact].
    Workforce: Targeted digital training + mentorship → higher job-readiness & employment → sustained livelihoods

From Logic Model to Living Report

For most organizations, the logic model ends when the document is complete — boxes filled, arrows drawn, ready for submission.
But that’s where the real opportunity begins.

A modern logic model framework shouldn’t stop at design; it should extend all the way to analysis and reporting. Each input, activity, and outcome deserves to be seen not as static text but as live evidence — evolving as the work unfolds.

That’s exactly what we show in Build Impact Reports That Inspire in 5 Minutes—Powered by Better Data.
The video demonstrates how the logic model becomes operational: how clean data collected through Sopact Sense transforms into an AI-generated report that visualizes change in real time.

“In about four minutes, you can build a designer-quality impact report that tells a credible story — combining numbers and narratives, accuracy and empathy.”

This is the true power of an integrated logic model framework:

  • The data from your logic model doesn’t sit idle in spreadsheets.
  • Every new survey or interview automatically strengthens your model’s evidence base.
  • Reports update continuously, giving stakeholders live visibility into results.

In the example shown — the Girls Code program — data from pre-, mid-, and post-surveys (test scores, confidence levels, and web application completions) fed directly into a logic model structure.
Within minutes, the system built a full report:

  • Inputs: Curriculum, mentors, and training infrastructure.
  • Activities: Coding workshops and mentorship cycles.
  • Outputs: 67% of girls built a web application mid-program.
  • Outcomes: Confidence and technical proficiency rose sharply.
  • Impact: Measurable progress toward economic inclusion.

This is where reporting becomes real-time — not retrospective. Instead of static dashboards that lose relevance over months, organizations now operate with live evidence pipelines that continuously connect logic, learning, and leadership.

Logic models were never meant to be compliance tools. They were always meant to be learning frameworks — and with AI, that vision finally becomes reality.

Logic Model vs Theory of Change

Understanding When to Use Each (and Why You May Need Both)

Organizations often use the terms logic model and theory of change interchangeably — but they serve distinct purposes.
The theory of change (ToC) is your strategic story: it explains why you believe your work will lead to change and outlines the conditions required for it to happen.
The logic model, on the other hand, is your operational map: it visualizes how that change unfolds step by step and connects directly to measurable data.

In simple terms:

  • A theory of change clarifies your thinking.
  • A logic model clarifies your measurement.
    Together, they create a feedback system where strategy meets evidence.

At Sopact, we see them not as competing frameworks but as two sides of the same learning loop.
Your theory of change provides the “why and what if,” while your logic model translates that theory into “how and how much.”
When both are connected through clean-at-source data, assumptions turn into real-world insights — continuously refined, not just reported.

Logic Model vs Theory of Change — and How Sopact Bridges Both

Logic Model Operational Map

  • Shows how activities lead to outcomes in a measurable chain.
  • Linear clarity: inputs → activities → outputs → outcomes → impact.
  • Great for monitoring, evaluation, and KPI ownership.
  • Directly ties to data capture and reporting cadences.
  • Best when you need operational alignment and accountability.

Theory of Change Strategic Framework

  • Explains why change should occur and under which assumptions.
  • Non-linear pathways, context, risks, and preconditions.
  • Ideal for design, stakeholder alignment, and grant narratives.
  • Makes causal logic explicit before measurement begins.
  • Best when exploring options and validating hypotheses.

Sopact Bridging Strategy & Evidence

How we connect ToC ↔ Logic Model
  • Clean-at-source data: forms/surveys structured to each model stage.
  • Identity-first records: outcomes linked to stakeholders over time.
  • Mixed-methods AI: numbers + narratives analyzed together.
  • Live dashboards: outcomes refresh as data arrives—no lag.
  • Governance-ready: lineage, consent, and audit trails built in.
Use both: Start with a Theory of Change to frame your causal logic and assumptions. Then operationalize with a Logic Model that assigns metrics, cadences, and ownership. With Sopact, both evolve together as evidence flows—turning strategy into continuous learning.

How Sopact Connects Both

In traditional monitoring systems, these frameworks live in separate silos — ToC in Word documents and logic models in spreadsheets.
Sopact merges them in one integrated Impact Learning System.
Your theory of change defines the causal logic, while your logic model streams real-time data into that logic.
As surveys, documents, and transcripts flow through the platform, both frameworks evolve together — assumptions tested, evidence visualized, and learning made actionable.

The result: a continuously improving impact story that grows stronger with every new data point.

Logic Model: Additional FAQs

Extra, non-duplicative guidance to strengthen learning, adaptation, and SEO/AEO for your logic model page.

Q1.How does a logic model support adaptive learning?

A logic model becomes useful when it’s revisited, not framed on a wall. Teams compare intended pathways with actual results to spot broken links. If outputs are high but outcomes lag, you can inspect assumptions or missing enabling activities. That encourages experimentation instead of end-of-year postmortems. Over time, the model drives shorter feedback loops and smarter pivots. It evolves into a living operating system for learning, not a static diagram.

Quick test: Did last quarter’s results change any assumptions or indicators? If not, you’re not using the model yet.
Q2.What role do stakeholders play in shaping a logic model?

Stakeholders surface realities that internal teams miss. Beneficiaries validate whether outcomes are relevant, equitable, and achievable. Funders clarify material indicators and reporting cadence. Community partners often reveal prerequisites like trust, access, or timing that determine success. Co-design raises credibility and adoption because the model reflects lived context. That shared ownership improves both implementation and evidence quality.

Tip: Bring at least one beneficiary, one delivery partner, and one funder into your next model refresh.
Q3.How is a logic model different from a business plan?

A business plan explains how the organization sustains itself; a logic model explains how change happens. The plan aligns markets, operations, and finance; the model aligns inputs, activities, and outcomes. Use the plan to secure sustainability and the model to secure impact. Together they reduce risk and clarify priorities. Reviewers want to see both: viability and verifiable change. Treat them as complementary artifacts, not substitutes.

Reminder: If a slide could swap “outcomes” with “revenue,” you’re mixing tools—separate them.
Q4.Can a logic model evolve over time?

It must. Early models are hypothesis-heavy; later versions should be evidence-heavy. As data accumulates, retire weak activities, sharpen assumptions, and promote indicators that truly predict outcomes. This keeps the model decision-relevant instead of decorative. Flexibility doesn’t mean chaos; it means disciplined iteration. The payoff is faster learning with less wasted effort.

Pro tip: Version your model (v1.0, v1.1…) and log what changed and why.
Q5.How do funders view logic models in proposals?

Funders read logic models as signals of strategic maturity. Clear if-then pathways show plausibility, not wishful thinking. Explicit risks and adaptation points reassure reviewers that you can navigate uncertainty. Strong models also simplify later reporting because indicators are pre-agreed. Programs that connect activities to durable outcomes stand out. In short, logic models quietly raise your win rate.

Action step: Tie at least one outcome indicator to a future learning decision you will make.

Logic Model Template

Turning Complex Programs into Measurable, Actionable Results

Most organizations know what they want to achieve — but few can clearly show how change actually happens. A Logic Model Template bridges that gap. It converts vision into structure, linking resources, activities, and measurable outcomes in one clear line of sight.

A logic model is not just a diagram or chart. It’s a disciplined framework that forces clarity:

  • What are we putting in (inputs)?
  • What are we doing (activities)?
  • What are we producing (outputs)?
  • What is changing as a result (outcomes)?
  • And how do we know our impact is real (impact)?

While most templates look simple on paper, their real power comes from consistent, connected data. Traditional templates stop at the design stage — pretty charts in Word or Excel that never evolve. Sopact’s Logic Model Template turns that static view into a living, data-driven model where every step updates dynamically as evidence flows in.

The result? Clarity with accountability. Teams move from assumptions to evidence, and impact becomes visible in days, not months.

AI-Powered Logic Model Builder

AI-Powered Logic Model Builder

Start with your program statement, let AI generate your logic model, then refine and export.

Start with Your Logic Model Statement

📋 What makes a good logic model statement? A clear statement that describes: WHO you serve, WHAT you do, and WHAT CHANGE you expect to see.
Example: "We provide skills training to unemployed youth aged 18-24, helping them gain technical certifications and secure employment in the tech industry, ultimately improving their economic stability and quality of life."
0/1000
📥

Export Your Logic Model

Download in CSV, Excel, or JSON format

📦

Inputs

Resources invested
  • Click "Generate Logic Model" above to start

Activities

What we do
  • Or manually add your own items
📊

Outputs

Direct products
  • Edit any item by clicking on it
🎯

Outcomes

Changes observed
  • All changes are auto-saved
🌟

Impact

Long-term change
  • Export when ready!

Assumptions & External Factors

Logic Model Examples

In the “Logic Model Examples” section, you’ll find real‑world, sector‑adapted illustrations of how the classic logic model structure—Inputs → Activities → Outputs → Outcomes → Impact—can be translated into practical, measurable frameworks. These examples (for instance in Public Health and Education) not only show how to map resources, actions, and changes, but also underscore how a well‑designed logic model becomes a living tool for continuous learning, not just a static planning chart. Leveraging the accompanying Template, you can personalize the flow to your own program context: insert your specific inputs, define activities tailored to your mission, articulate quality outputs, track meaningful outcomes, and ultimately connect them to lasting impact—all while building in feedback loops and data‑driven refinement.

📚 Education Logic Model

Program Goal: Improve student academic achievement and school engagement through evidence-based instruction, family engagement, and social-emotional learning support.

Inputs

Resources What We Invest
Staff: Teachers, instructional coaches, counselors, family liaisons
Funding: Federal Title I, state grants, local district budget
Materials: Curriculum materials, digital learning platforms, assessment tools
Partnerships: University researchers, community organizations, parent groups
Data Systems: Student information system, learning management system, assessment platforms

Activities

What We Do Core Program Activities
Differentiated Instruction: Teachers deliver personalized lessons based on student learning profiles and formative assessments
Small-Group Tutoring: Targeted support for students below grade level in reading and math (3x per week, 30 minutes)
SEL Curriculum: Weekly social-emotional learning lessons integrated into advisory periods
Family Engagement Workshops: Monthly sessions on supporting student learning at home, conducted in multiple languages
Teacher Professional Development: Quarterly training on culturally responsive pedagogy and data-driven instruction

Outputs

What We Produce Direct Products & Participation
Students Served
450 students across grades 3-5
Tutoring Sessions
3,600 small-group sessions delivered per term
SEL Lessons
36 lessons per student per year
Family Workshops
9 workshops with avg. 35 families attending
Teacher Training
24 hours per teacher per year
Formative Assessments
3 checkpoints per student per term

Outcomes: Short-term (1 term / semester)

Early Changes What Changes We See First
Student Engagement
75% of students report feeling more engaged in class (baseline: 52%)
Reading Skills
Students gain avg. 0.5 grade levels in reading fluency
Math Confidence
68% of students report increased confidence in math (baseline: 48%)
Attendance
Chronic absenteeism decreases from 18% to 12%
Family Involvement
60% of families attend at least 2 workshops (baseline: 28%)
SEL Skills
Students demonstrate improved self-regulation (teacher observation rubric)

Outcomes: Medium-term (1 academic year)

Sustained Progress Deeper Learning & Behavior Change
Academic Proficiency
55% of students score proficient or above on state assessments (baseline: 42%)
Grade Promotion
92% of students promoted to next grade on time (baseline: 85%)
Behavioral Incidents
Office referrals decrease by 35%
Sense of Belonging
80% of students report feeling they belong at school (baseline: 61%)
Parent Engagement
Parents report increased confidence supporting learning at home (survey avg. 4.2/5)
Teacher Efficacy
Teachers report increased confidence using data to inform instruction (avg. 4.5/5)

Outcomes: Long-term (2-3 years)

Impact Transformational & System-Level Change
Achievement Gap
Achievement gap between economically disadvantaged students and peers narrows by 20%
College Readiness
70% of 8th-grade cohort meet college readiness benchmarks (baseline: 52%)
Graduation Rates
High school graduation rate for program cohort reaches 88% (district avg: 78%)
School Culture
School climate survey shows sustained improvement in safety, respect, and engagement
Family-School Partnership
80% of families report strong partnership with school (baseline: 54%)
Systemic Adoption
Program model adopted by 5 additional schools in district

⚠️ Key Assumptions & External Factors

  • Teacher Capacity: Teachers have time and support to implement differentiated instruction effectively
  • Family Engagement: Families can attend workshops (transportation, scheduling, language support provided)
  • Student Stability: Student mobility remains stable; students stay enrolled for full academic year
  • Technology Access: Students have reliable access to devices and internet for digital learning
  • Policy Environment: State/district policies support evidence-based practices and allow curriculum flexibility
  • Funding Continuity: Multi-year funding allows program to mature and show sustained results
📋 Copy to AI-Powered Logic Model Builder →

🏥 Healthcare Logic Model: Chronic Disease Management

Program Goal: Improve health outcomes for patients with chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension) through coordinated care, patient education, and self-management support.

Inputs

Resources What We Invest
Staff: Primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, care coordinators, health educators, community health workers
Funding: Medicaid reimbursement, value-based care contracts, foundation grants
Technology: Electronic health records (EHR), patient portal, telehealth platform, remote monitoring devices
Materials: Educational materials in multiple languages, blood pressure monitors, glucometers, medication organizers
Partnerships: Local hospitals, pharmacies, community organizations, transportation services, food banks

Activities

What We Do Core Program Activities
Care Coordination: Monthly check-ins with care team, personalized care plans, medication reconciliation
Patient Education: Group diabetes/hypertension self-management classes (6-week curriculum), nutrition counseling
Remote Monitoring: Daily blood glucose/BP tracking with alerts to care team for out-of-range values
Medication Management: Pharmacy consultations, medication adherence counseling, cost assistance programs
Social Support: Community health workers address social determinants (food access, transportation, housing)
Telehealth Visits: On-demand video consultations for urgent questions or medication adjustments

Outputs

What We Produce Direct Products & Participation
Patients Enrolled
500 patients with diabetes or hypertension
Care Plans
500 personalized care plans created
Check-ins
6,000 monthly check-ins completed per year
Education Classes
12 cohorts x 6 sessions = 72 classes delivered
Remote Monitoring
350 patients using devices with daily data transmission
Telehealth Visits
1,200 telehealth visits conducted per year

Outcomes: Short-term (3-6 months)

Early Changes What Changes We See First
Patient Activation
65% of patients score at "activated" level on Patient Activation Measure (baseline: 42%)
Self-Management Knowledge
80% of patients can describe 3+ self-care behaviors (baseline: 35%)
Medication Adherence
Adherence rate increases to 75% (baseline: 58%)
Self-Monitoring
70% of patients self-monitor glucose/BP at least 5 days/week (baseline: 28%)
Care Team Contact
90% of patients have at least 1 contact with care team per month
Patient Confidence
Patients report increased confidence managing their condition (avg. 4.1/5)

Outcomes: Medium-term (6-12 months)

Clinical Progress Health Status Improvement
Diabetes Control
55% of diabetic patients achieve HbA1c <7% (baseline: 38%)
Blood Pressure Control
62% of hypertensive patients achieve BP <140/90 (baseline: 45%)
Weight Management
45% of patients achieve 5% weight loss (baseline BMI >30)
ER Visits
Diabetes-related ER visits decrease by 30%
Preventive Care
85% of patients complete annual eye exam and foot exam (baseline: 52%)
Quality of Life
Patients report improved quality of life (avg. increase of 1.2 points on 5-point scale)

Outcomes: Long-term (1-3 years)

Impact Long-term Health & Cost Outcomes
Complication Rates
Diabetes complications (retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy) decrease by 40%
Hospitalizations
Chronic disease-related hospital admissions decrease by 35%
Healthcare Costs
Average annual cost per patient decreases by $3,200
Sustained Control
70% of patients maintain clinical control at 24 months
Patient Satisfaction
90% of patients rate care experience as "excellent" or "very good"
Program Sustainability
Model adopted by 3 additional health centers; Medicaid approves ongoing reimbursement

⚠️ Key Assumptions & External Factors

  • Patient Engagement: Patients are willing and able to participate actively in self-management activities
  • Technology Access: Patients have smartphones or tablets for telehealth and remote monitoring
  • Insurance Coverage: Services (care coordination, telehealth, devices) are covered by insurance
  • Social Determinants: Patients have stable housing, food security, and transportation to appointments
  • Care Team Capacity: Staff have adequate time for monthly check-ins and responsive follow-up
  • Medication Affordability: Patients can afford copays for medications; assistance programs are accessible
📋 Copy to AI-Powered Logic Model Builder →

💼 Workforce Development Logic Model: Tech Training to Employment

Program Goal: Improve employment outcomes for unemployed and underemployed adults through technology skills training, mentorship, and job placement support.

Inputs

Resources What We Invest
Staff: Instructors (software development), career coaches, mentors, employer relations manager
Funding: Federal workforce development grants, corporate philanthropy, tuition scholarships
Curriculum: 12-week coding bootcamp (web development), soft skills training, interview preparation
Technology: Learning management system, laptops/devices for participants, cloud development environments
Partnerships: Employer partners (tech companies), community colleges, social service agencies, alumni network

Activities

What We Do Core Program Activities
Recruitment & Screening: Outreach to community organizations, aptitude assessments, motivational interviews
Technical Training: 12-week intensive bootcamp (HTML/CSS, JavaScript, React, Node.js) with hands-on projects
Mentorship: Each participant paired with industry mentor for weekly 1-on-1 sessions
Career Coaching: Resume building, LinkedIn optimization, mock interviews, salary negotiation training
Capstone Project: Teams build real-world applications for nonprofit partners; present to employer panel
Job Placement Support: Direct introductions to employer partners, job fairs, interview coordination
Post-Graduation Support: 6-month alumni cohort with ongoing career coaching and peer networking

Outputs

What We Produce Direct Products & Participation
Participants Enrolled
120 participants per year (4 cohorts × 30)
Training Hours
480 hours per participant (12 weeks × 40 hours)
Mentorship Sessions
12 sessions per participant (weekly)
Career Coaching
8 coaching sessions per participant
Capstone Projects
30 deployed applications per year
Employer Connections
25 partner companies providing job opportunities

Outcomes: Short-term (End of training)

Early Changes What Changes We See First
Program Completion
85% of enrollees complete the full 12-week program
Technical Skills
90% of completers demonstrate proficiency on final technical assessment
Portfolio Quality
85% of participants complete a portfolio-ready capstone project
Confidence Growth
Participants report 2.5-point increase in coding confidence (1-5 scale)
Job Readiness
100% of completers have updated resume, LinkedIn, and GitHub portfolio
Network Building
Participants average 8 new professional connections (mentors, employers, peers)

Outcomes: Medium-term (3-6 months post-graduation)

Employment Progress Job Placement & Retention
Job Placement Rate
75% of graduates employed in tech roles within 90 days
Job Quality
85% of placed graduates in full-time positions with benefits
Salary Gains
Average starting salary: $55,000 (baseline: unemployed or $28K median)
6-Month Retention
88% of placed graduates remain employed at 6 months
Career Confidence
Graduates report strong confidence in long-term tech career (avg. 4.3/5)
Continued Learning
60% of graduates pursue additional certifications or training

Outcomes: Long-term (1-2 years)

Impact Career Advancement & Economic Mobility
Career Progression
45% of graduates receive promotions or move to mid-level roles
Income Growth
Average salary increase to $68,000 at 18 months (24% growth)
Economic Stability
70% of graduates report improved financial security and ability to support family
Long-term Employment
80% remain employed in tech sector at 24 months
Alumni Engagement
55% of alumni return as mentors or guest speakers
Employer Satisfaction
90% of employer partners rate program graduates as "meeting or exceeding expectations"

⚠️ Key Assumptions & External Factors

  • Participant Commitment: Participants can dedicate 40 hours/week for 12 weeks (childcare, transportation, income support addressed)
  • Tech Aptitude: Screening process identifies candidates with aptitude and motivation for coding
  • Employer Demand: Local tech labor market has sustained demand for junior developers
  • Mentor Availability: Industry professionals have time and willingness to mentor weekly
  • Portfolio Value: Employers value demonstrated skills and portfolios over traditional degrees
  • Post-Graduation Support: Alumni have access to ongoing career coaching and peer network
📋 Copy to AI-Powered Logic Model Builder →

🌾 Agriculture Logic Model: Smallholder Climate Resilience

Program Goal: Increase agricultural productivity and climate resilience for smallholder farmers through climate-smart agriculture training, improved inputs, and market linkages.

Inputs

Resources What We Invest
Staff: Agricultural extension agents, climate specialists, market linkage coordinators, data collectors
Funding: Government agriculture grants, NGO partnerships, private sector investment (seed/fertilizer companies)
Inputs: Climate-resilient seeds, organic fertilizers, water-efficient irrigation equipment, storage facilities
Training Materials: Climate-smart agriculture curriculum, farmer field school guides, mobile app for weather/market info
Partnerships: Agricultural research institutes, farmer cooperatives, buyer networks, microfinance institutions, meteorological services

Activities

What We Do Core Program Activities
Farmer Field Schools: 12-session curriculum on climate-smart practices (drought-resistant crops, water management, soil conservation)
Input Distribution: Provide subsidized climate-resilient seeds and organic fertilizers at start of planting season
Demonstration Plots: Establish model farms in each village to showcase best practices and compare yields
Climate Information: SMS alerts for weather forecasts, planting dates, pest warnings via mobile platform
Market Linkages: Connect farmers to buyer cooperatives; facilitate bulk sales and fair pricing agreements
Financial Literacy: Training on record-keeping, savings groups, and accessing agricultural credit
On-Farm Visits: Extension agents provide personalized technical assistance (monthly visits per farmer)

Outputs

What We Produce Direct Products & Participation
Farmers Enrolled
2,000 smallholder farmers across 50 villages
Training Sessions
600 farmer field school sessions (12 per village × 50 villages)
Inputs Distributed
2,000 seed packages + 1,800 tons organic fertilizer
Demonstration Plots
50 model farms established (1 per village)
Climate Alerts
15,000 SMS alerts sent per season (weather, pests, market prices)
Extension Visits
18,000 on-farm visits per year (avg. 9 per farmer)

Outcomes: Short-term (1 growing season)

Early Changes What Changes We See First
Practice Adoption
70% of farmers adopt at least 3 climate-smart practices (baseline: 15%)
Knowledge Gain
85% of farmers can describe benefits of drought-resistant crops and soil conservation
Input Use
90% of farmers use improved seeds and organic fertilizers on at least 50% of land
Information Access
75% of farmers report using SMS alerts to inform planting/harvesting decisions
Peer Learning
60% of farmers visit demonstration plots and share learnings with neighbors
Market Connections
50% of farmers join buyer cooperatives for collective marketing

Outcomes: Medium-term (1-2 years)

Productivity Gains Yield & Income Improvements
Yield Increase
Average yield increases by 35% (from 1.2 to 1.6 tons/hectare)
Crop Quality
65% of harvests grade as A or B quality (baseline: 40%)
Income Growth
Average household agricultural income increases by 40% ($850 to $1,190/year)
Market Access
70% of farmers sell to cooperatives at 15% higher prices than previous middlemen
Drought Resilience
Farmers report 50% less crop loss during dry spells (self-reported + yield data)
Food Security
80% of households report adequate food supply year-round (baseline: 55%)

Outcomes: Long-term (3-5 years)

Impact Resilience & Community-Level Change
Sustained Productivity
Yields remain 30%+ above baseline over 3 consecutive seasons
Climate Shock Recovery
Farmers recover from drought/flood events 40% faster than non-participants
Economic Stability
70% of households diversify income sources (off-farm work, livestock, small business)
Land Investment
55% of farmers invest in soil improvements, water harvesting, or storage infrastructure
Knowledge Diffusion
Climate-smart practices spread to 3,500+ non-participant farmers through peer learning
Community Resilience
Villages report 25% decrease in climate-related migration and improved food security indicators

⚠️ Key Assumptions & External Factors

  • Land Tenure: Farmers have secure land rights to invest in long-term soil improvements
  • Climate Patterns: Weather remains predictable enough for seasonal planning; extreme events don't exceed adaptation capacity
  • Market Stability: Buyer cooperatives maintain fair prices and purchase commitments
  • Input Supply: Seeds and fertilizers remain available and affordable through supply chains
  • Extension Capacity: Extension agents can maintain monthly visit schedules across 2,000 farmers
  • Technology Access: Farmers have mobile phones and network coverage for SMS alerts
📋 Copy to AI-Powered Logic Model Builder →

Time to Rethink Logic Models for Today’s Needs

Imagine logic models that evolve with your programs, keep data clean from the start, and feed AI-ready dashboards instantly—not months later.
Upload feature in Sopact Sense is a Multi Model agent showing you can upload long-form documents, images, videos

AI-Native

Upload text, images, video, and long-form documents and let our agentic AI transform them into actionable insights instantly.
Sopact Sense Team collaboration. seamlessly invite team members

Smart Collaborative

Enables seamless team collaboration making it simple to co-design forms, align data across departments, and engage stakeholders to correct or complete information.
Unique Id and unique links eliminates duplicates and provides data accuracy

True data integrity

Every respondent gets a unique ID and link. Automatically eliminating duplicates, spotting typos, and enabling in-form corrections.
Sopact Sense is self driven, improve and correct your forms quickly

Self-Driven

Update questions, add new fields, or tweak logic yourself, no developers required. Launch improvements in minutes, not weeks.